What will it take to keep the Asia-Pacific Journal free and vibrant? Our immediate goal to achieve by December 31, 2013: $10,000 to keep the journal free to readers for 2014; our long-range goal $50,000 to place the journal on a trajectory of independence.
We have launched our annual fund-raising campaign with greater strength and quality of work than at any previous time. The initial responses have brought in more than $4,000 and, with your support, we are confident that we can meet our short-term goals. The Asia-Pacific Journal is a 501 (C) (3) non-profit organization recognized by the Internal Revenue Service. Contributions are tax deductible. We value and depend on your tax-deductible contributions. We have now had a challenge grant, to match gifts of $50 or more up to $1,000 received by December 31. We hope that you will take advantage of this opportunity to maximize your tax-deductible gift.
12,000 regular readers now receive our work via the Newsletter or Facebook and Twitter, and we are investigating making our content available through other electronic means. More than 100,000 articles are accessed monthly by readers in 180 countries, and many more are being read through circulation at other sites such as History News Network and Truthout that reprint them. We have created a major archive on Japan’s 3.11 triple disaster, the flawed responses, and the creative search for new green energy approaches beyond nuclear power. And our work on US-Japan-Okinawa relations and on war and historical memory is now supplemented by a wide range of contributions in the realm of culture . . . film, music, anime, manga and the like in Asia-Pacific perspective. For the first time we have NPO status, meaning that U.S. contributions are tax deductible. If you wish to support our campaign in the form of a subscription ($25 or $50; $10 for students and developing countries; $100, $500 and larger contributions by those in a position to place the journal on a firm foundation for the future) please gohereor click the red Sustainer Button on ourhome pageand use Paypal or a credit card.
Alternative Summits, Alternative Perspectives: Beyond the 2008 Hokkaido G8 Summit
The Hokkaido Toyako Summit 2008 was held from 7-9 July 2008 in the picturesque hot spring resort town of Toyako. This series of four essays critically evaluates the contributions and limits of the Toyako Summit to ongoing international discourse and action on some of the pressing issues of our time. In particular, it focuses on the gathering of national leaders, some of the alternative events that coincided with the summit organized by NGOs and citizens’ groups, and the effects of the summit on its host region Hokkaido.
There are three overarching themes: first, the summit and alternative summits are not treated as ends in themselves but as part of a broader, longer-term process of discussion of a variety of developmental and social issues; second, the activities of NGOs and civil society in response to the Summit are assessed from the perspective of their effects on the economy and society of Hokkaido and beyond; and third, in the context of the current media climate of predominantly critical reportage of G8 summits, the series attempts to challenge prevailing views by airing perspectives that received relatively little treatment in the mainstream media.
In particular, the series proposes that the success or failure of the summit should not be seen simply in terms of the statements and policy agreements made by the G8 leaders and other national leaders who congregated in Hokkaido in early July. The G8 summit should also be assessed as a catalyst and stage for civic action. There are many who have called for the end to G8 summits, such as Walden Bello in a fiery speech to the opening plenary of the People’s Summit, Sapporo Convention Center, on 6 July 2008. But a broader conclusion of this article series is that civil society and NGOs might be among the primary losers from the cessation of G8 summits providing a high profile venue for assessing many of the issues swept under the rug by state leaders. Indeed, civil society participants were instrumental in many of the greatest achievements of the 2008 G8 summit. At the same time, the authors critically assess the claims and outcomes of the G8 summit. Our aim, therefore, has been to find a more complex balance between the polarized views of G8 apologists, on the one hand, and the summit’s most strident critics (such as Walden Bello) on the other.
The four contributors to this series of four essays were all present in Hokkaido during the summit and participated in G8-related activities. Hugo Dobson spent the summit at the International Media Centre in Rusutsu. ann-elise lewallen was on the organizing committee of the Indigenous People’s Summit. And Lukasz Zablonski and Philip Seaton were on the organizing committee of another of the alternative summits: “International Symposium: Peace, Reconciliation and Civil Society”. They share, moreover, a common sense of the larger issues posed by the summit, if not necessarily a common set of conclusions about the events taking place both at the official venue and beyond. My thanks go to them, not only for their papers, but also for their extensive cross-reading of other articles in the series. I am also grateful to the referees, Peter Hajnal, Richard Siddle, William Underwood and Watanabe Makoto; to all the other people who took time to comment on drafts; and to Mark Selden for all his encouragement along the way.
Philip Seaton, Hokkaido University.
Posted at Japan Focus on November 30, 2008.
Recommended citation: Philip Seaton, "Alternative Summits, Alternative Perspectives: Beyond the 2008 Hokkaido G8 Summit" The Asia-Pacific Journal, Vol. 48-4-08, November 30, 2008.