Subscribe to the Journal:

is a reader-supported journal

Tax deductible Contributions welcome via Pay Pal or credit card. If you would like to support the Journal, please do so here. The Asia-Pacific Journal is available free to all. Your support allows us to improve our service in a new era of conflict in the Asia-Pacific.
$25.00 $50.00 $100.00

Join Us:JapanFocus Twitter page  APJ Facebook Page  

Display Your BOOK, FILM, OR EVENT here

 Peace  Philosophy  Centre

Dialogue and learning for creating a peaceful, sustainable world.



Click a cover to order.
Click a cover to order.
Click a cover to order.
Click a cover to order.
Click a cover to order.
Click a cover to order.
Click a cover to order.
The Asia-Pacific Journal: Japan Focus
In-depth critical analysis of the forces shaping the Asia-Pacific...and the world.

Nikon, Neo-Nationalists and a Censored Comfort Women Photo Exhibition ニコン,ネオ・国粋主義者達、従軍慰安婦写真展検閲

Makiko Segawa

Nikon, Neo-Nationalists and a Censored Comfort Women Photo Exhibition


Nikon is the one of the world’s most renowned and trusted camera makers, especially among professional photographers and journalists. So, its recent decision to pull the plug on an exhibition by Ahn Sehong, a 41-year-old Nagoya-based Korean photo-documentary artist, surprised many who might have expected the company to defend the integrity of artistic expression.  Forced to reverse that decision by the Tokyo District Court, which ordered it to hold the exhibit, the company banned Ahn from giving interviews to the media at the gallery – in effect censoring him from discussing his own work – and prevents foreign press from entering the venue.

The exhibition, Layer by Layer: Surviving Korean Comfort Women Left Behind in China <here> was scheduled to run from June 26th to July 9th at the Shinjuku Nikon Salon in Tokyo. About a month before it was due to open, Nikon told Ahn that the exhibition was cancelled.  All indications are that the company bent to pressure from Japanese neonationalist zealots.

To cap the incident, a great deal of Ahn’s personal and contact information has been leaked online, possibly exposing him to danger from those zealots. “It suggests that in the future we photographers will have to think hard in advance about what we exhibit for Nikon.”

Ahn has been working for over a decade on the issue of the forgotten Korean comfort women left in China after the war. So strongly does he feel that he says he has used about four million yen (US$50,000) of his own money on the project. His motivation, he says, is not political but what he calls "pure humanitarian sympathy” for the women. “Most have died and the survivors live alone in poor conditions.”

In an interview with this writer on May 30th in Shinjuku, Ahn was angry and defiant. “I will not surrender to Nikon’s request -- I am still preparing my exhibition for its June showing." When we first spoke, he was preparing a legal challenge to the Nikon decision.

Ahn says a Nikon official called him on May 22th to tell him of the cancellation and offer to come personally and apologize. The official, who repeatedly swatted away Ahn’s demands for an explanation, later sent him an official apology letter dated May 24th. ?The letter added insult to injury by informing him that a second photo exhibition, scheduled for September 13th to 19th at the Osaka Nikon Salon had also been cancelled.

A panel of five experts had cleared the exhibition along with Nikon, so what can have gone wrong?  Ahn speculates that only right-wing pressure can explain the cancellation. “I want to solve this problem by discussing it with Nikon, but they do not have either the will or the honesty to talk to me." He sent a letter to Nikon on May 23rd with a list of questions, asking for an explanation. Here is the less-than-illuminating reply he received two days later:

Ahn: What made you decide to cancel the photo exhibition?

Nikon: We decided to do so after considering various situations in general.

Ahn: What is the purpose of Nikon Salon? For whom does this exhibition space exist?

Nikon: The purpose is to spread and improve the culture of photography. Our salon provides a space for photographers and lovers of photographs.

Ahn: Prior to the decision to cancel, didn't you have any will to fight for the exhibition?

Answer: Our company decided to stop the exhibition after we considered various situations in general.

This writer got the very same response when I called the public relations office of Nikon on May 30th. ?An official said he was “not allowed” to make any other comments.  But when pressed he admitted the following: “It is a fact that we have received quite a lot of emails and phone calls protesting against the photo exhibition."? In fact, the company’s decision to host the exhibition was denounced on Internet bulletin boards, with some people calling for a boycott of Nikon.  Even after the cancellation announcement, some bloggers continued to vent their anger: “They are just prostitutes!,” said one, referring to the standard nationalist whitewash of the sex slaves issue.

On May 25th, neo-nationalists gathered outside Nikon’s main office in Tokyo to “congratulate” the company for cancelling the exhibition. A reporter for ultra-right webcaster Channel Sakura spoke to me. "The photo exhibition deserved to be halted because people should not show things that are not based on facts,” he said.

“It is a part of the state strategy of South Korea to request further apologies from Japan and to procure money by condemning our past.”

The reporter offered his own analysis of why Nikon cancelled the exhibition: "They stopped it because they were afraid that a boycott would mobilize effectively.”

Ahn soon learned that his safety may have been compromised. On May 26th after the Japanese media aired the Nikon story, his home address in Nagoya and the personal information of colleagues involved in the project were leaked on a right-wing website. Since then, he has received frequent threatening calls. When his wife reported this situation to the police in Nagoya, they said, "We have already been informed about it."

Ahn expresses concern about the safety of his family. He also noted that shortly before Nikon's decision, a scheduled lecture in Nagoya was abruptly cancelled. "It is photographers and fans of photography who have defended our gallery. It is shameful that Nikon betrays photography and art because of this political pressure," Ahn says.

Benjamin Ismail, Asia head of the media watchdog Reporters Without Borders, condemned what he called the “censorship” of Anh Sehong’s exhibition. "Nationalist lobbying to prevent such work from being shown is a direct violation of freedom of information. It is unfortunate when a private company such as Nikon passively complies with such censorship.”

The Japanese courts agreed. On June 22nd, Ahn won the legal right to stage his exhibition after the Tokyo District Court issued a directive to Nikon to permit it to go ahead as planned. Nikon conceded defeat but Nikon lawyers instructed Ahn that he could not talk to the media during the opening on June 26th. “I had to go at the first floor, then walk to the closest park outdoors in order to speak to reporters who came to visit my exhibition. In such situation, I feel that my freedom of expression are denied,” he said. He was not allowed to sell his photos and banned from posting fliers or advertisements of any kind outside the gallery. Nikon not only did not announce the exhibition on its website, but it forced all visitors to go through rigid security checks. Neo-nationalists surrounded the Shinjuku Nikon Salon, yelling racist abuse and demanding that Ahn ‘go home’ to Korea.

Ahn says Nikon staff even followed him outside the building to check who he was talking to. “Three lawyers from Nikon are following to eavesdrop and record my every move,” he explained. He was left with the clear impression that the camera-maker was trying to smother the exhibition it had sponsored. “I fear that Nikon is desperately looking for any excuse to overturn the (court) order in the hope of canceling my exhibition,” he said. “I have been censored.”

“I am enduring this for the sake of visitors, but this is like the period of Japan’s occupation of Korea.” Ahn’s protest against Nikon’s censorship and harassment, and a petition seeking support is at his website called “I AM CENSORED” <here>

The incident comes at a time when the wartime comfort women issue has surfaced repeatedly in South Korea, in the United States and in Okinawa. Japanese lawmakers and activists, for example, have secured 25,000 signatures for a petition on the White House website calling on the Obama administration to compel New Jersey to close a small Palisades Park monument dedicated to the memory of the comfort women on the grounds that “False accusations regarding the South Korean comfort women issue have disgraced the people of Japan for decades.”


On related subjects:

Jake Adelstein, "Comfort Women" Show Makes Nikon Uncomfortable But Not Tokyo Courts."

<Comfort Women Memorial> On June 25 The Women’s Active Museum on War and Peace opened an exhibit a Tokyo exhibit on Okinawan comfort women including testimonies by 300 comfort women, including Okinawan and Korean women <JapanTimes: Okinawa Exhibition>. The exhibition will move to Okinawa in July.

Recommended citation: Makiko Segawa, "Nikon, Neonationalists and a Censored Comfort Women Photo Exhibition," The Asia-Pacific Journal, Vol 10, Issue 27, No. 1, July 2, 2012.

Makiko SEGAWA is a freelance journalist based in Japan, as well as a translator and guide to overseas media. She is the Japan correspondent of Reporters Without Borders. She can be contacted at

We welcome your comments on this and all other articles. More are available on our homepage. Please consider subscribing to our email newsletter or RSS feed, or following us via Twitter or Facebook.

Adam Jon Lebowitz
Visited the exhibition last Sunday. There were not any protest groups outside, but maybe it was too early. One guard deferentially checked bags. There was a metal detector to pass through staffed by another guard. One more stood at attention more or less in the middle of the room, which was small. Some company staff in green armbands also milled about. A lot of security for two dozen photos, but it did not seem terribly obtrusive because the photos themselves were so absorbing. We arrived when it opened, and a stream of viewers of all ages speaking Nihongo and Hangul continued in. Nobody prevented us from talking to Mr. Ahn, although it probably would not have been prudent to whip out a notebook and conduct an interview. Nonetheless, there was the standard sign-in book and surveys to write opinions and request info about Ahn's future exhibitions. Nikon is a very big company and unlikely to be hurt by a boycott of the scale suggested. Rather, the decision to cancel suggested by the security precautions shows they were more concerned about property damage, and being sued in case of damage to the photos (hence their statement to him that they were simply "lending" him space absolving themselves of personal responsibility), or worse being sued by visitors in case of personal injury were there any violence. The Nikon Salon website did not "not" advertise the show, but no images on the scheduling calender were posted, only the statement that they had planned on canceling the show but the Tokyo District Court ordered them to proceed under protest. There were no signs outside the Nikon building advertising, but it is a tiny gallery on a top floor, and it may not be regular practice to do so. This show was a testimony to Mr. Ahn's character for choosing to undertake the project and battle Nikon, as well as to the women in the photos and their unbearable experiences.
M Henri Day
I may be far too optimistic, but the court decision to force Nikon to hold Mr Ahn's exhibition, combined with the recently reported Japanese Supreme Court decision in the Hamada Masaharu case ( might just possibly indicate that the judicial system in Japan is in the process of becoming something other than the spineless creature of the government that it has been since Meiji days. A hopeful development, in that case.... M Henri Day
Add comment
Authors: For all articles by the author, click on author's name.   Makiko Segawa